The Last Sherlock Holmes Story Page 2

  ‘I see no harm in that,’ I cried hotly. ‘Really, Holmes! If you are going to object to every trifle! He removed the scene of the arrest from the cab-yard to our rooms simply to condense the action, thereby rendering it more effective. The thing is perfectly in order. Why, in classical drama it was a requirement! I believe the device is referred to as Unity of Place.’

  Holmes smiled sweetly. ‘How interesting,’ he purred. ‘You never cease to edify, my dear fellow. Perhaps you would be so good as to elucidate for my benefit the device – classical or otherwise, I’m not particular – which induced Jefferson Hope to present himself that evening at an address to which, not twenty-four hours earlier, he had refused to come, rightly suspecting a trap?’

  This left me at a loss. To tell the truth, I had fallen under A.C.D.’s spell to such an extent that this fundamental error had wholly escaped me. Holmes observed my confusion wryly. ‘Whoever belittles my opponents, belittles me,’ he concluded, tossing the volume aside. ‘Let us hear no more of this meddler. The association is at an end.’

  I was familiar enough with Holmes’s moods to recognise the futility of further argument. The subject was dropped, and I began to consider how I should break the news to A.C.D. In the event I was let off lightly. Holmes’s disillusionment with ‘A Study in Scarlet’ was fully shared, although for very different reasons, by its author. Having had the greatest difficulty in placing it with a publication, he then had to endure an almost complete lack of interest in the product of his labours – a fate, as he told me, worse than any amount of adverse notice. Having tried out his novelty and seen it fail, he decided to turn his hand once more to a conventional product, where he soon met with considerably greater success. Thus at that time there seemed every reason to believe that the association was indeed at an end.

  A.C.D. did not in fact attempt another such piece for two years. The case he then treated was that into which Holmes and I were plunged in the summer of 1888 and it is here that my own narrative has its beginning. Although the affair which A.C.D. was to call ‘The Sign of Four’ seemed at the time no more than another entry in the long list of mysteries which Holmes had been called upon to solve, in hindsight it is clear that it marked a watershed in Holmes’s life, and in his relations with me. The reason is not far to seek, and has nothing to do with Jonathan Small, or with the Agra Treasure over which so much blood was spilt. But in the course of Holmes’s investigations I met and fell in love with Mary Morstan, whose father’s disappearance had set the whole train of events in motion. I was fortunate enough to find my feelings reciprocated, and in due course I was able to announce our engagement to Holmes.

  His response stunned me. I had not expected him to be overjoyed at the news, but I was astonished by his inability even to dissemble his displeasure. To this day I can hear his groan, and the cold words that followed.

  ‘I really cannot congratulate you.’

  This remark was, to say the least, extremely embarrassing. I hardly knew how to reply. In the end, though, I managed to come up with some banter to the effect that everyone concerned seemed to have done well out of Holmes’s success in the Sholto case, except Holmes himself.

  ‘You have done all the work in this business,’ I cried. ‘As it is, I get a wife out of it, and the police get all the credit. Pray what remains for you?’

  His face was set and his voice bleak as he replied.

  ‘For me there remains the cocaine-bottle.’

  How could I have overlooked the implied appeal? How could I fail to understand? I am staggered by the extent of my blindness. But then perhaps nothing I could have done would have made any difference. Perhaps what was to happen would have happened in any case. Perhaps its sources were in deeper and darker regions than those over which I ever had any influence. Perhaps. Perhaps.

  This is what I tell myself. My heart tells me that I betrayed my closest friend in the hour of his need, and I know no way to answer.

  * William Clark Russell (1844–1911) was a prolific and popular writer of adventure stories with a maritime setting. He was apparently one of Dr Watson’s favourite authors. Swinburne referred to him as ‘the greatest master of the sea, living or dead’, but his reputation has not survived.

  † The affair of Miss Helen Stoner and her stepfather Dr Grimesby Roylott was, however, to be made public four years later in the adventure of ‘The Speckled Band’.

  One

  My notes – which I shall endeavour to follow with the minimum of extraneous comment for the remainder of this narrative – reveal that on the morning of Friday the 28th of September 1888, Sherlock Holmes received a telegram. This was in itself scarcely a remarkable occurrence. At that period telegrams were coming and going with such frequency at 221b Baker Street that I sometimes wonder how many clerks Holmes maintained in permanent employment with the welter of messages he received and dispatched. This state of affairs resulted from a problem which had been developing for several years with regard to Holmes’s consulting practice.

  The problem was simple, inevitable, and apparently quite insurmountable. It sprang from the fact that crime, like any other human activity, follows a limited number of patterns. Ninety-nine out of a hundred crimes are immediately recognisable to an expert as being of this type or of that. There is no mystery to be solved, no puzzle to tax the brain. All that is required to apprehend the guilty party is hard work and a little luck. Such crimes gladden the heart of the police force, whose capacity for hard work has never been in doubt, but to Holmes they were anathema. His first question on being asked to undertake an investigation was always the same: did it contain any features of interest? If so, he would happily fling all his energies into the task, be his client duchess or dustman, his fees a king’s ransom or a beggar’s alms. But if the requisite features of interest were absent, nothing would induce him to intervene – and if his hand were forced, as in the matter of the Aldershot scandal of ’86, those responsible soon discovered to their chagrin that unless his interest was engaged, Holmes was a mere shadow of the man whose mental powers could seem almost supernatural when they were fully deployed.

  Sherlock Holmes originally set up as a consulting detective in 1877, some four years before I met him. Cases were at first hard to come by, but at that time each presented a fresh challenge and was tackled with enthusiasm. Ten years later the position was very different. Like all superior intellects, Holmes disdained to cover the same ground twice, and thus a point was bound to come when he spent less time solving crimes than he did lying about our front room bemoaning the dullness and lack of enterprise of the British criminal class. At such moments he frequently put me in mind of a jaded emperor from the last days of Rome, berating his underlings for their inability to create a spectacle lavish or rare enough to divert him. It was at about this time that he began to resort to cocaine. At first the drug was nothing more than an occasional expedient to which Holmes had recourse when every other weapon for staving off ennui had failed him. I regarded it as a filthy habit, but still preferable to the alternative – unpredictable and savage outbursts of nervous energy in which he would assault the furniture with a horsewhip, or in some still less desirable way relieve the pent-up frustration of his soul. I vividly recall the occasion when he sat himself down with a revolver and a box of cartridges and began firing at the opposite wall, until he had improved its appearance with a script V.R. and crown executed in bullet-pocks. Holmes was a man very finely balanced between reason and hysteria. He liked to compare himself to a racing-engine, which will tear itself to pieces unless coupled to the work that it was designed to do. In the absence of such work the cocaine seemed to act as a regulator, and as such I was prepared to turn a blind eye to his use of it. It seemed at first an acceptable remedy for Holmes’s chronic ailment.

  But as interesting cases became less and less frequent, the occasional vice became more and more so, until at the period of which I speak Holmes was regularly injecting into his blood a solution of almost standard strength thr
ee times a day.* I do not know whether the reader is familiar with the effects of cocaine. By 1972 the drug may have passed for ever from the face of the earth, or, I suppose, be given to squalling children to quiet them. Although without the physically deleterious effect of opium, cocaine is a powerful and dangerous agent when used indiscriminately for personal pleasure, and not – as Nature surely intended – for the relief of pain. The mood of the user is at once exalted to unprecedented heights, only to be subsequently plunged into the most profound lassitude, which of itself demands a renewal of the dosage. Soon the desire for the drug becomes a vicious craving. All one’s social and moral standards are undermined, for nothing can offer satisfactions to rival those freely available within the closed circle of one’s own mind. In the end, the addict ceases to regard himself as a member of the human race, and by the same token he usually ceases to behave like one. The world and its denizens come to seem a pale and fraudulent imitation of his own fantasies, and he treats them much as a spoiled child treats toys which have ceased to amuse him. Such was the perilous ally to which Sherlock Holmes had turned for relief, and once I realised the extent to which he had come to depend on the drug I strove with all my might to wean him from it. But to no avail. Whatever arguments I advanced, his reply was always the same:

  ‘My dear Watson, nothing would give me greater pleasure than to give it up. Only bring me work! Find me some problem to exercise my intellect, and you may play at darts with my needles for all I care.’

  To this I had no answer. Holmes had been stalemated by his own prodigious genius. He had solved every problem, and thereby created one which appeared truly insoluble.

  But though the fires burned low, they had not gone out, and since Holmes’s fame was now at its zenith his advice was sought on all sides. Hence the telegrams. Every morning after breakfast he so far compromised his indolence as to read through the newspapers, cast an eye over his post, and then fire off cryptic memoranda to various destinations. ‘How many rungs had the ladder?’ a message might run, or ‘If the milk was off, Furneaux is your man.’ These oracular pronouncements were dispatched daily all over our islands, and in some cases also to the Continent. They were received generally with gratitude, occasionally with incredulity, but very rarely in vain. Holmes’s inferences were almost always proved correct, and where they failed it always subsequently transpired that some fact had been distorted or withheld. Not that his vicarious triumphs appeared to afford Holmes the slightest pleasure. It was a ritual he performed each day, as one might any tedious but necessary duty, and then resumed his brown study.

  I was therefore both astonished and delighted when my friend – having read the telegram of which I speak – handed a scribbled reply to the boy, gave out a brief laugh, and began to pace the floor as of old.

  ‘Is it a case, Holmes?’ I enquired hopefully. His last investigation, the Cushing horror, had been concluded more than a month before.†

  ‘In a way,’ said he, handing me the form in passing.

  The telegram was from one of Holmes’s old contacts at Scotland Yard. I read: ‘Have you been following these Whitechapel killings? I might call later if you are free. We have something fresh. G. Lestrade.’

  I looked up in some surprise at Holmes, who chuckled.

  ‘You may not be aware, Watson, that among my other accomplishments I have become something of an expert at interpreting the Scotland Yard dialect. It is an interesting idiom, although its relation to English as we know it is somewhat tenuous. This telegram is a good example. A tiro would never suspect that behind this mask of insouciance there hides a desperate man, a man hounded and harried by the press, by the public, and by his superiors – a man at his wits’ end, begging for help! Translated into our common tongue, Lestrade’s message reads: “Three women brutally murdered this past month in Whitechapel – more killings expected – all suspects released for lack of evidence – utterly baffled – you are our last hope – for God’s sake say you’ll see me!”’

  ‘And did you?’

  ‘Oh certainly. One should never miss the spectacle of the police in loco clientis. Besides, this case is of some considerable interest. You have heard of it, of course?’

  The question was indeed purely rhetorical. There can have been no one in the kingdom that fateful autumn who was unaware of the terrible events unfolding in the East End. People could talk of nothing else.

  ‘I really didn’t imagine you would consider it worth looking into, Holmes,’ I answered. ‘It all seems rather sordid and disgusting. Hardly your style, I would have thought.’

  ‘Sordid enough and disgusting enough, in all conscience, but redeemed by some quite extraordinary features of interest – as I may be able to show you. Would you have the goodness to hand me down the red volume on the topmost shelf? I must confess that Lestrade’s cri de coeur has not come as a complete surprise to me. I have been expecting something of the sort for several weeks now, and to that end I have been compiling a few cuttings on the subject. It is never a good idea to let the constabulary feel that they have you at a disadvantage. It inflames their inherent sense of superiority. Now then, if you are agreeable, I will run over the facts as briefly and clearly as I can. This will be of the greatest benefit to me, in refreshing my grasp of the case.’

  ‘I could wish for nothing better,’ said I, and meant it most sincerely. The coolness that had sprung up between us since I announced my engagement had suddenly been dispelled. The cloud I feared had settled for ever on Holmes’s spirit had suddenly lifted. The game was afoot once more!

  Holmes leafed through the commonplace book with one hand, while with the other he lifted down the Persian slipper containing his tobacco.

  ‘Let me see! “Another Ghastly Murder in Whitechapel.” Hm! “Horrible Atrocities of a Maniac.” Quite so! “Reign of Terror in East London.” “Police Impotent.” Dear me! “Fearful Scenes,” “Sketches at the Inquest,” “Bloodstains on the Stones.” Well! The fourth estate has certainly been having a field-day. But once you skim off the froth and the frissons, the actual matter might be copied on to a single sheet of note-paper – such as this one. Now before examining the murders individually we should note the important features they have in common. Each of the victims was a female pauper of doubtful morals. All three were middle-aged, physically unprepossessing, and lacking even a few pence for a bed. They thus had to spend the night in the streets, where they were murdered within a few hundred yards of each other during the early hours of the morning. All of which raises the interesting question of motive, or rather the lack of it. Why should anyone wish to kill these pathetic drabs? Gain is out of the question, and the notion of any of the three being the object of a crime passionel is plainly grotesque. But there is another and even greater mystery, which also stamps the three killings as being the work of the same hand. In each case the weapon used was a knife, and it was wielded not merely to kill but to mutilate. The first victim, Tabram, was stabbed repeatedly in the stomach. The other two had their throats cut and were then disembowelled. It was this that first drew my attention to the case. It makes for something distinctly out of the ordinary. Here is a cutting from the Star, describing the corpse of the second victim, Nicholls.’

  I took the open volume from him, and read the following.

  The throat is cut in two gashes, the instrument having been a sharp one, but used in a ferocious and reckless way. There is a gash under the left ear, reaching nearly to the centre of the throat. Along half its length, however, it is accompanied by another one which reaches around under the other ear, making a wide and horrible hole, and nearly severing the head from the body. The ghastliness of this cut, however, pales into insignificance alongside the other. No murder was ever more ferociously or more brutally done. The knife, which must have been a large and sharp one, was jabbed into the deceased at the lower part of the abdomen, and then drawn upwards, not once but twice. The first cut veered to the right, slitting up the groin, and passing over the left hip, but the s
econd cut went straight upward, along the centre of the body, and reaching to the breast-bone.

  ‘Good God, Holmes! What manner of man could –’

  ‘All in good time, Watson, all in good time. I am not without my ideas, but these are deep waters. We would do well not to theorise in advance of the facts.’

  ‘If I had not read it in the newspaper, I would not have believed it possible. In these days! In our England! Of all the infamies you have ever had to deal with, this must surely be the most abominable!’

  ‘I do not doubt it. Certainly this killer, whoever he may be, is no common criminal. But to continue. Tabram was slain on the seventh of last month, and Nicholls on the thirty-first. Eight days later a third body was discovered, in a yard behind a house in Hanbury Street. Where are my notes of the inquest? Yes: “The throat had been severed. There were two distinct clean cuts. It appeared as though an attempt had been made to separate the bones of the neck.” I quote from the evidence of Dr Philips, the police surgeon who examined the victim. “There were various other mutilations of the body but I am of the opinion that they occurred subsequent to death. I think I had better not go into further detail of these mutilations which can only be painful to the feelings of the jury and the public.” Humph! Strange scruples, one might think, under the circumstances. The coroner evidently did, for when the inquest resumed he pressed the point. In the words of the Illustrated Police News, “witness then detailed the terrible wounds which had been inflicted upon the woman and described the parts of the body which the perpetrator of the murder had carried away with him.” Which is as far as that upstanding organ, the censor morum of our semi-literate class, is prepared to go. Its reticence was shared by the rest of the daily press, including The Times, which termed Dr Philips’s evidence “totally unfit for publication”. Indeed, one might have been forced to appeal to Lestrade for enlightenment, were it not that you, my dear Watson, still maintain that slender link with the world of medicine: a subscription to the Lancet. That excellent journal was of course under no necessity of sparing its readership, and was thus able to print the unprintable section of Dr Philips’s evidence.’